Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions Essay

Reflection scrap Critical reflections on the Westphalian assumptions of planetary fair play and organization a crisis of legitimacy. Although the pretermit of world government, most people agree that there is a carcass of norms and rules of conduct that generate international rectitude. International law has for the most part examinated from devil dissimilar positions. When power and interests clashes, skeptics see international law as a insignificant and nonexistent. Especially, the article of A.Claire Outler focuses on this problem. However,others have occasionally seen international law as a strong tool to organize and change the demeanor of states for the better. The main impotance or constraint of international law is the conflicting and generally uncertain provisions in international treaties and conventions. Also, legal system lacks the requisite Juristiction and an adopted hierarchy because most powerful and developed countries ignore and search to run way the limi tations of international law.I recollect that this situation all the way shows the weaknesses of international law. A influential legal code requires to reconcile itself to positive behaviour of individuals and states and not try to essentially remake them according to knock off moral principles. In general, realist are more suspicious about the trend of international law on the other hand,liberals and constructivist rely on it is, and should be, a crucial force shaping the behavior of states.To sum up, I think that this article was a very useful because it shows the negative and positive aspects of the cut clearly. However, some part of the article was a little bit non-white about the validity of international law. It generally focuses on deficiencies of international law. I agree that there is lack of world government and international law hasnt compulsory Jurisdiction but this doesnt mean that international law is not real and necessary law.