Evaluation of Critical Theory in Tourism Essay Example for Free

Evaluation of Critical Theory in Tourism EssayIn spite of the consensus on the importance of interrogation, the existing literature in hospitality and tourism research does not contain whatever commonly agreed upon ways of evaluating research executing. The most frequently used proxy for assessing research performance is authorship and institution analyses by counting the number of published articles in selected research journals (Jogaratnam, McCleary, Mena, and Yoo, 2005 Malhotra and Kher, 1996 Sheldon, 1991 Weaver, McCleary, and Farrar, 1990 Zhao and Ritchie, 2006). 4 eon counting the number of published articles in selected journals may be simple to perform and interpret, this approach is suit to many methodological problems. Wood (1995), as well as Losekoot, Verginis, and Wood (2001), argued that counting publications in selected journals as an indicator of academic productivity is too narrow and geographically-based.Similarly, Ryan (2005) and Hall (2005) stated that foc using on publications in research journals would exclude many researchrelated activities such as writing books, supervising postgraduate students, and taking on lead roles in the international academic community. Likewise, the conjecture which this paper makes is that using the number of published articles in selected tourism and hospitality journals as an indicator of research performance is an incomplete, if not biased approach, as otherwise research-related activities are simply excluded from consideration.Such a statement is made on the basis that many ceremonious academics do not publish in the selected journals. In addition, in order to obtain a much comprehensive measurement of research performance, other scholarly activities such as participation in research projects, editorship of research journals, membership of editorial boards and conference committees, participation in international conferences, and memberships of international/national organisations should too be incorporated into the overall evaluation process.In response to the absence of prior studies on ascertain research performance for tourism and hospitality academics in a comprehensive way, this exploratory study makes an endeavour to fill the void by investigating the perception of university program heads on the importance of different research-related activities. broadcast heads are the academics who assume key responsibilities in academic departments ordivisions. Examples of these key responsibilities include research leadership and evaluations (Wikipedia, 2006). Findings are thus anticipated to lead to 5 further insights on research performance evaluation, which in turn help academics appropriately set their own career development plans.